UNDP-FAO-GEF
PROJECT: REDUCING BIODIVERSITY LOSS AT CROSS BORDER SITES IN EAST AFRICA.
DISCUSSION
NOTE
ALTERNATIVE
RESOURCE USE STRATEGIES AND ALTERNATIVE LIVELIHOOD STRATEGIES FOR COMMUNITIES
AROUND FORESTS
1. INTRODUCTION
The
East African Cross-borders Biodiversity Project aims to “Reduce
the rate of loss of forest biodiversity in specific cross-border sites of
national and global significance in East Africa” The Project seeks to
achieve this border goal through implementation of activities through a set of
Immediate Objectives, Outputs and Activities:
The national level project log frame (see
new Log-Frame document) has two Immediate Objectives within the overall goal
of reducing biodiversity loss at the selected cross-border sites. Objective A
seeks better regulation of biodiversity use practices (conservation).
Objective B seeks support to local communities for alternative strategies
of resource use (Output B2) and the development of Alternative Income Strategies
(Output B3). The site plans for the
Sango Bay and Minziro swamp forests; and for Monduli and Same District forests (see separate documents on site log frames and plans), fit in with
the national log-frame as they address the issue of developing alternative
resource use strategies.
·
Bring in mechanisms for the sustainable harvesting of key products
·
Provide for alternative supplies of major resources (fuel, poles etc)
e.g. through promoting on-farm tree resources
·
Provide for livelihood and income strategies by stakeholder communities
that reduce natural resource dependence, e.g. alternative technology strategies,
alternative income strategies and alternative use strategies.
This project is thus an Integrated Conservation and Development Project (ICDP),
which seeks to meet conservation goals and social priorities of the people.
The participatory intervention planning process at all project sites (see
papers by Consultant Sejal Worah) have led to interventions to integrate
conservation and community needs.
THE
UGANDA EXPERIENCES
Establishing alternative livelihoods for communities, and establishing alternative resource use strategies adjacent to the Sango Bay Forest Reserve is one of the interventions to address the project site level objective, “Off-take of key forest resources in Sango Bay reduced”. Arising out of the site specific participatory intervention planning process, implementation of some of the field activities relating to alternative livelihoods and alternative resource use strategies for the communities has started.
A:
Establishing alternative resource use strategies for key forest resources
firewood, poles, timber, medicinal plants, fish and palm leaves.
Tree
nursery activities
These activities are going on, for the case of Rakai, in the three target sub-counties of Kyebe, Kabira and Kakuuto Subcounties (LC3 level). The tree nurseries are intended to provide alternative sources of poles, firewood, agroforestry trees, palm leaves and income from the sale of the surplus seedlings and poles. Both long-term timber trees, and short-term firewood, poles and agroforestry trees are promoted. Through Local Government and NGO partners, the project has adopted a three-pronged approach in order to increase on-farm tree production. This integrated approach meets the needs of both subsistence scale tree growers, as well as the medium scale commercial tree farmers.
Central
Nurseries at Sub-County Level (Local
Government through MoUs).
These
are run in a cost-sharing manner with the subcounties. The sub-counties have
received an assortment of nursery tools and materials.
District Forest extension staff, working hand in hand with the sub-county
secretaries for production and environment provide technical support.
The subcounty provides locally available inputs such as labour,
construction materials and local seeds. The tree nursery at Kabira initially
raised Eucalyptus for poles and fuelwood, and pines, Maesopsis eminni (Musizi) and Podocarpus
usambarensis (Podo) for timber. The
nursery at Katera (Kyebe) began with Podocarpus usambarensis, Maesopsis
eminni and Beilschmedia ugandensis
(locally known as Mwasa) for timber. Fruit
and agroforestry trees are also now being raised.
Seedlings from the nurseries are sold to local communities at subsidized prices (as an incentive). The Sub-Counties have budgets for agriculture and forestry activities, and some of this money is used to support nursery activities. In addition, the funds raised from the sale of the seedlings go back into the running of the nursery. Both of these attributes contribute to the sustainability of activity
Central
Nurseries at Village Level (Involving CBOs):
Through
our partner NGO Integrated Rural Development Initiatives (IRDI), CBOs in
villages have established tree nurseries. Village nurseries serve 1-4 villages. To
date village nuseries have been established, Kigazi, Buzinde, Mayanja, Lukoma
and Matengeto. The nursery at Mayanja contains medicinal herbs as well. Planting
out of seedlings from the nurseries has started.
This approach of establishing nurseries at village level promotes
community self-mobilization for biodiversity and environmental management in
general. Initially, the villagers
shared the seedlings, but have started selling. The funds raised will be used to run the nurseries to ensure
continuity.
Home
nurseries at household level (dealing with interested individuals):
The
partner NGO in Kabira Sub-County- Vi Agroforestry Project uses this approach.
Through the partner, the project is facilitating extension workers who
deal with individual households. This approach ensures that farmers raise and
plant the trees of their choice.
Table
1: Summary of Project Nursery
Activities
Type
of Nursery |
Rakai |
Moroto |
Kotido |
Total |
Home tree nurseries
|
166 |
4 |
1 |
171 |
Community- village nurseries |
6 |
6 |
2 |
14 |
Central nurseries at LC3 level |
3 |
3 |
3 |
9 |
School nurseries |
5 |
10 |
2 |
17 |
Total number seedlings so far |
295,000 |
195,000 |
30,000 |
520,000 |
A
baseline survey carried out by the NGO partners in the project area reveals that
the majority (over 80%) of the community surrounding the Sango Bay collect
firewood from the forests. The
survey further reveals that over time (five-ten years back), there has been a
sharp decline in firewood availability outside the forests mainly due to
deforestation, agriculture and settlement expansion, restrictions by lease
holders and charcoal burning; thus the shift to the forest reserve as the major
sources of firewood. While
addressing the issues of alternative sources, the project is at the same time
promoting efficient resource use technologies.
Through
partner NGOs (IRDI, Vi and ICR[1])
the project promotes both the UNICEF and LORENA firewood saving stove models in
Kabira Kakuuto and Kyebe Sub-counties. The stoves save between 50-60% of the
energy burned through traditional three stone stoves. This efficiency rating agrees with the information from the
beneficiaries who say that (collecting the same sizes of firewood bundles from
the forest), they have reduced the number of times they used to go to the forest
per week by half. Initially the
NGOs, (especially IRDI) trained the district extension staff, who in turned went
out to train groups of interested people in the villages.
The trained villagers in turn have trained other people in the village
who did not have the opportunity to participate in the training by extension
staff. This kind of approach has had a multiplier effect as well as positive
sustainability implications. The
stoves are inexpensive since they are entirely made out of locally available
materials (a mixture of sand, clay, cow dung, extract from potato leaves and
water, plus five bricks).
Table
1: Project Coverage for Improved Cook-Stoves: The case of IRDI for Parishes
around Sango Bay after a few weeks implementation.
PARISH |
Katovu |
Mayanja |
SangoBay |
Kakuto |
Number
of Villages |
7 |
8 |
3 |
10 |
Number
of Households |
990 |
741 |
350 |
1078 |
Number
of households with improved cook-stoves |
180 |
165 |
58 |
42 |
Alternative
Energy Technologies
IRDI
is promoting the use of biogas in the communities adjacent to the Sango Bay
forests. This is being
piloted with two farmers in Katovu area in Kakuuto Sub-county and the technology
is expected to be extended to more households with time.
B: Alternative Income Strategies
Improved
Crop production:
Regarding
alternative sources of income, the project supports general extension through
NGOs. The latter work closely with the District extension staff. A survey done
in the focus sub-counties revealed that banana, coffee, sweet potatoes, beans,
cassava, maize and groundnuts are the major on-farm sources of income for the
majority of the community. However, the farmers say comparing the current crop
production with that 5-10 years ago, the production has declined.
The yields are poorer. Some
farmers therefore supplement on-farm income with income from sale of handcrafts
(especially mats), carpentry, charcoal burning, pitsawying, brickmaking and
fishing, all of which have a direct impact on the biodiversity of Sango Bay.
The
project therefore, through partners supports agriculture and forestry extension
in order to boost on-farm sources of incomes for the farmers in the target
sub-counties. While the sub-counties are helping farmers to acquire high
yielding seeds of some of the major crops (beans, cassava, maize and sweet
potatoes), the project came in to support soil management practices, coffee
growing and better banana management practices.
At Kabira and Kakuuto, the sub-counties, jointly with the project support
coffee and tree nurseries. The coffee seedlings when ready for planting will be
sold to the farmers at subsidized prices. While
the entire community benefits from these interventions, the project pays special
attention to resident charcoal burners and palm leaf collectors, who have land
and can concentrate on crop production. The
ultimate objective is to reduce dependency on the forest for income.
Parish |
Katovu |
Mayanja |
Sango
Bay |
Kakuuto |
No
of Villages |
7 |
8 |
3 |
10 |
Total
Households |
990 |
741 |
350 |
1078 |
Number
with improved banana gardens |
42 |
60 |
15 |
35 |
Passion
fruit growing:
This
is a high value crop with a big potential as a source income.
An assessment into its feasibility will soon be undertaken.
The advantage with this crop is that it does not need a lot of land since
it can be grown as hedge plant and on compound and farm trees.
The tree nursery at Kakuuto has already supplied over 500 seedlings of
passion fruits to farmers. The
demand for more seedlings is still high.
A:
Alternative Use and Supply Strategies
i)
Tree
Nursery Support
Rural
communities adjacent to the forest sites depend mostly on the forest resources
to meet their basic needs of household energy, building poles, herbal medicine,
vegetables, pasture, etc. In most
cases the rate of regeneration and resource increment is lower than the rate of
off-take leading to accelerated loss of biodiversity.
In
addressing this challenge, the Tanzanian Component has initiated and continues
to
support the production of tree seedlings in individual and group nurseries in
all villages adjacent to the focal forest sites.
The Project support is mainly provided in term of the necessary technical
advise and some nursery materials, tools and equipment, e.g. polythene tubes,
watering cans, transportation of forest soil, tree seeds etc. The beneficiaries
provide the necessary labour and some materials, tools and own both the
nurseries and the seedlings produced. The
seedlings produced are then planted out into the farmers fields, woodlots,
homesteads and the surplus can be sold out to other villagers for generation of
income.
So
far the project support on tree nurseries has been as follows:-
Type
of Nurseries |
Same |
Monduli |
Bukoba |
Total |
Private
Individual Nurseries |
4 |
8 |
5 |
17 |
NGOs |
30 |
- |
1 |
31 |
CBOs |
- |
7 |
6 |
13 |
Schools |
10 |
7 |
7 |
24 |
Raised
seedlings |
15,000 |
400,000 |
316,000 |
731,000 |
Seedlings
planted out |
10,000 |
300,000 |
160,000 |
470,700 |
Survival
% of planted seedlings |
74% |
51% |
85% |
70%
Average |
By
supporting nurseries the project hopes to reduce the rate of loss of
biodiversity in the forest sites in the long run, because the villagers will be
able to get the supplies for their wood requirements from their own woodlots,
homesteads and farms outside the focal forest sites.
ii)
Alternative Use and Alternative Technological Strategies.
Requirements
for household energy is one of the major factors necessitating extraction of
wood either as firewood or charcoal by communities adjacent to the focal forest
sites. The extraction is mostly for household energy needs although extraction
for sale is also done especially for urban dwellers.
a)
Fuelwood Efficient Stoves
The
rate of wood extraction is directly related to the rate of consumption.
The higher the rate of wood conversion into heat energy the lower the
rate of wood consumption and vice versa. Efficient
fuelwood stoves will require small amount of wood to produce the same amount of
energy that will be obtained from a much larger amount of wood when less
efficient fuelwood stoves, e.g. the traditional three stones stoves are used.
In
Tanzania, three different types of efficient fuelwood stoves have been adopted
and continue to be promoted one type at each site.
Although scientific verification of their efficiency is yet to be done,
rough estimates puts the Bukoba type at over 50% (one bundle of firewood is now
used for eight days instead of three days for the three-stone stove).
A household using the efficient type of stove in Same now goes twice a
week to collect firewood instead of everyday as it was before. And in Monduli
District each household using the efficient stove now uses one bundle of
firewood for two days instead of one day as it was before.
Some
statistics for fuelwood efficient stoves are as follows:-
Villages
Involved |
Same |
Monduli |
Bukoba |
Total |
6 |
5 |
12 |
23 |
|
Total
homesteads |
80 |
250 |
1870 |
2200 |
Households
with efficient stoves |
50 |
150 |
1614 |
1814 |
b)
Non-wood Alternative Energy Strategies
In
addressing the issue of loss of forest biodiversity caused by the production of
household energy, the project in Tanzania is currently promoting the use of
other alternative sources of energy supply.
This includes the use of biodigesters (biogas plants) to produce gas from
animal dung in the pastoralist areas of Monduli District, promotion of Jatropha
carcus planting for production of fuel-oils for cooking and the use of solar
energy stoves.
Currently
there are two concrete (dome type) biodigers installed and in use in Monduli
District, one at Monduli and one at Longido Divisions. The two plants produce
enough gas for both cooking and lighting in the beneficiary families. A total of
twelve families have been supported by the project to install plastic
biodigesters one each for production of gas for both cooking and lighting. One
solar energy stove have also been installed in Monduli.
B:
Alternative Income Strategies
One
of the major reasons underlying over-dependency on forest biodiversity resources
is poverty. Most of the adjacent communities are poor, lack alternative ways of
earning income and thus extract wood resources for sale. They also lack cash
income to meet their financial obligations including purchasing of substitutes.
There is therefore a strong link between poverty and level of
environmental destruction.
The
Project in Tanzania is currently supporting beekeeping activities in all the
three sites as an alternative source of income to the communities.
The support provided is in terms of the necessary technical advice,
working facilities, marketing advice and some materials and equipment. To
closely link the activity with biodiversity conservation of the forests a
mechanism is now underway to allow sighting of beehives into the focal forest
sites. The Project support to
beekeeping can briefly be summarized as follows;-
Activity Beekeepers
Supported |
Same |
Monduli |
Bukoba |
Total |
270 |
160 |
60 |
490 |
|
Beehives
registered – modern
- traditional |
25 1500 |
170 - |
10 70 |
205 1570 |
Awareness
meetings conducted |
10 |
4 |
1 |
15 |
Working
facilities issued |
70
protective gears, 70
harvesting gears |
Same
amount |
Support
is coming |
|
Water
Hyacinth Products
The
project is currently supporting one group in Bukoba on the production and sale
of water hyacinth products, which is seen as an alternative source of income.
The group operates as a community based organization made up of twenty
voluntary members. The variety of items made out of water hyacinth includes
chairs, lampshades, baskets, post-cards, picture-frames etc. Since started the
group has managed to make a total sales amounting to Tshs. 250,000/= and orders
standing at Tshs. 400,000/=.
By
promoting and supporting alternative income strategies the project hopes that,
in the long run the adjacent communities will have less incentive to cut trees
from the forest sites for sale because they will have been enabled to get the
necessary income from the alternative income strategies.
SNV
Dutch support for Eco-Tourism in Monduli and Same Districts
SNV
had initiated a normal cultural tourism support through local initiatives, in
both Same (Pare Mountains) and Monduli (Mto-wa-Mbu and Longido). This Cross Borders Project has established partnerships with
SNV within the two areas. SNV
funding comes to an end in late 2001 and we found it relevant to support the
idea of ecotourism as started by SNV, and to add funding with the vision of a
longer-term biodiversity conservation component.
Our
support is mainly to the information centre initiation, and sharing the baseline
data on site biodiversity that will build on existing general cultural
information. This baseline data
will include amongst other things, local use of indigenous plants from the
documented resource user survey, and knowledge of plant and bird species in the
mountain forests.
The
project will support an ongoing booklet on the South Pare traditional
conservation systems and base it with the Tona Lodge and Kisaka Villa (both near
Chome Forest Reserve in Same District). Cultural tourism has not yet been fully
initiated in Bukoba. Lessons
learnt from Monduli and Same Districts will soon be shared by Bukoba.
Note: that many of these activities are implemented
through partnerships with other organisations, and these are described more
fully in the other Discussion Note on Developing Partnerships.